Locke Lord’s Molly McGinnis Stine, Tara Trifon and Lindsey Kress co-authored a Bloomberg Law Insights article outlining the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion v. Ramirez on future privacy and cybersecurity claims. The authors expect plaintiffs in data breach cases will increasingly turn to state courts for relief, they write.
The ruling has significant implications for standing, building on the Supreme Court’s earlier ruling in Spokeo. “TransUnion holds that only plaintiffs concretely harmed by a defendant’s statutory violation have standing to pursue a claim in federal court. Those ‘concrete’ harms can be tangible or intangible, but they cannot be purely statutory in nature,” the authors write.
However, they note, “It is unclear whether the court’s decision will mean that data breach plaintiffs do not have standing unless and until they become, for example, the victim of identity theft, or whether the door has been left sufficiently open for a plaintiff to succeed by satisfying the increased risk of future harm analysis.”
To read the full article, click here (subscription may be required).
Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest to your inbox.