X
    X
    X
    X

    Extending The Murky Divide Between Warranty And Insurance

    Outside Publication

    Atlanta Partner and Co-Chair of Locke Lord's Regulatory and Transactional Insurance Practice Group Brian Casey and Austin Senior Counsel Jon Gillum co-authored an article examining a West Virginia federal court’s decision in Bare v. Innovative Aftermarket Systems LP and the significance in the warranty-versus-insurance divide.

    The authors note: “On the whole, the Bare court’s decision should provide greater regulatory comfort for warrantors who offer anti-theft programs and those entrepreneurs who will use this decision to design the next wave of innovative warranty products. However, the Bare decision still leaves a split of authority in the anti-theft product space with one of the largest insurance markets in the country — New York — taking a contrary view.”

    To read the full article, click here (subscription may be required).

    Explore Additional Topics

    Disclaimer

    Please understand that your communications with Locke Lord LLP through this website do not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with Locke Lord LLP. Any information you send to Locke Lord LLP through this website is on a non-confidential and non-privileged basis. Therefore, do not send or include any information in your email that you consider to be confidential or privileged.