After presenting at the Casualty Actuarial Society Seminar on Reinsurance, Chicago Partner Ernesto Palomo was quoted throughout a Carrier Management article on how reinsurers might respond when cedents pay their insureds for business interruptions stemming from COVID-19. He presented several scenarios in which primary insurers paid claims under policies that did not have virus exclusions and ceded losses to their reinsurers under contracts with “follow-the-fortunes” language. Palomo noted that three factors determine whether a claim paid by a ceding company is going to be covered by a reinsurance agreement: the terms of the reinsurance contract, the terms of the underlying policy and applicable laws. Focusing on the reinsurance agreement, he reviewed two typical provisions: follow-the-fortunes and follow-the-settlements clauses.
In addition, Palomo explained the aggregation clause typically found in excess-of-loss treaties, which allows a ceding insurer to combine multiple loss occurrences so that only one retention needs to be satisfied — as long as they are linked to a common event or cause. “We saw in the context of asbestos, pollution and health hazard claims that insureds and cedents employed many creative arguments to describe a covered event. In the [COVID] situation, I would predict certainly that cedents are going to use stay-at-home orders as the event that will allow the cedent to combine losses out of one event,” he said.
Palomo is a member of Locke Lord’s Insurance, Reinsurance, and Business Litigation and Dispute Resolution Practice Groups.
To read more, click here (subscription may be required).
Sign up for our newsletter and get the latest to your inbox.