X
    X
    X
    X

    Internet marketing of collective investment schemes to professional investors

    Publications

    On 22 March 2013, a company and its director were acquitted by the Hong Kong's Magistrate's Court of four counts of issuing advertisements to promote a collective investment scheme, including posting relevant information on the company’s website, without the authorisation of the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in contravention of section 103 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance.

    The defendants' case was that the relevant advertisements were directed to professional investors and as such did not require authorisation by the SFC under a statutory exemption. The Magistrate accepted the defendants’ argument and ruled also that the advertisements did not constitute invitations to the public to invest in the collective investment scheme. The SFC is considering an appeal of the decision.

    This is a particularly interesting case as there is currently no guidance from the SFC on what is permissible marketing in relation to professional investors. It is hoped that this case will spur the SFC to work with the industry to agree standards of conduct with respect to advertising private funds to institutions and other professional investors.

    Source: http://www.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/news-and-announcements/news/doc?refNo=13PR21

    Explore Additional Topics

    Disclaimer

    Please understand that your communications with Locke Lord LLP through this website do not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship with Locke Lord LLP. Any information you send to Locke Lord LLP through this website is on a non-confidential and non-privileged basis. Therefore, do not send or include any information in your email that you consider to be confidential or privileged.